From Standalones to Series: A Reader’s Evolution

While I used to avoid book series entirely, favouring standalone stories, there were delightful exceptions like the Harry Potter saga, which I stumbled upon by chance. Back then, I believed sequels were often purely a commercial ploy, publishers milking the success of the first book. I didn’t want to disparage authors or publishers, but felt, as with any industry, discernment was the key.

However, here’s the thing: once I begin a series, I usually want to finish it. The fear of missing a crucial twist or an amazing conclusion is too strong. But there is the risk a seemingly perfect ending in the first book can be spoiled, as sometimes things don’t go like the reader wish.

Books

This perspective has evolved over time. Today, my reading choices are influenced not just by mood, but also by my daily schedule and available time. Recently, I desire to buy the series by Sarah J. Maas, and put holds on The Prison Healer and Twisted Love – the first due to lack of engagement, and the second for excessive sexual content.

This highlights how a reader’s preferences can change. We may prioritize quick, standalone stories in one phase, and crave in-depth series in another. The key is to embrace what resonates with us at each stage of our beautiful reading journey.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *